Pussy Pass in Ontario Courts

"Speaking softly and chuckling at odd points in the narrative, the woman accused of plotting to kill Mississauga teenager Aleksandra Firgan-Hewie told a Superior Court jury Tuesday that her former boyfriend and co-accused acted alone." [1]

Some Canadian Law on Murder:

Homicide [2]

• 222. (1) A person commits homicide when, directly or indirectly, by any means, he causes the death of a human being.

Classification of murder [3]

• 231. (1) Murder is first degree murder or second degree murder.

Hijacking, sexual assault or kidnapping

(5) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of any person, murder is first degree murder in respect of a person when the death is caused by that person while committing or attempting to commit an offence under one of the following sections:

• (a) section 76 (hijacking an aircraft);
• (b) section 271 (sexual assault);
• (c) section 272 (sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm);
• (d) section 273 (aggravated sexual assault);
• (e) section 279 (kidnapping and forcible confinement); or
• (f) section 279.1 (hostage taking).

"Accessory after fact to murder[4]

240. Every one who is an accessory after the fact to murder is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life.

• R.S., c. C-34, s. 223." 

There are troubling things about this case beyond the murder of a 13 year old girl. Do not take me wrong I am not belittling this horrendous crime. The guilty party(ies) deserve the book thrown at them and then some. 

The troubling part is the all to well known pussy pass. 

You know when the courts fail to hold a woman to the same standard of accountability as a man. It has been a standard of justice for quite some time now and the examples of it are too numerous to mention but lets touch upon a one shall we.

Perhaps the best well known case of the pussy pass was given to Karla Holmolka. Karla was given a reduced sentance for giving testimony against her former husband Paul Bernardo. She was given this reduced sentance on the condition that she did not lie to the police and crown attorneys when giving her confessions and or written and or recorded to them, but she did.

There was video taped evidence of her lies, but that didn't matter, Karla was given 12 years for her part in the killing of 3 young girls, despite her lies.

Need proof dear reader well here it is;

"Most people believe there was only one "deal with the devil."

That may be technically correct in terms of Homolka's essential plea bargain in May 1993 but, in truth, there were two. A second pivotal decision by Code's team on May 18, 1995 essentially gave Homolka the blanket immunity she sought from the outset. It was made on the eve of Bernardo's trial, with Homolka slated to be star witness for the prosecution.
Her 1993 plea bargain stipulated that authorities would not protect her from prosecution if she lied or left herself open to charges of "obstructing justice, public mischief, fabricating evidence, perjury, inconsistent statements and/or false affidavits."


But that's what she did, says Osgoode Hall law professor Alan Young. In a 1996 memo to Galligan, obtained this week by the Star, Young argued that Homolka "perpetrated a fraud by hiding the full extent of her criminal wrongdoing." He says she withheld evidence on the Mahaffy/French murders and covered up details of the rapes of Jane Doe. The videotapes showed the girl being sexually assaulted by the couple on two separate occasions.


Homolka apparently "forgot" about Jane Doe. It came back to her in a dream. On Oct. 6, 1993, she wrote Walker "I'm having a major problem. Paul raped Jane, a friend of mine. I don't remember much of it ... I have to tell them but what if they nail me for this too?" ....
"... Young remains skeptical. "She has a dream and it starts to come back. The first thing she does is write her lawyer asking for immunity because she's afraid she would be 'nailed' for this disclosure," he says. "She's protecting her ass. Is this an amnesia victim or a manipulative person?" [5]


" leaving Karla to keep the halothane-laden rag over her sister's face. " [6]


So there you have it Karla's deal was built on a foundation of lies told by her a manipulative killer. A Killer who I might add planned and participated in the rape of her sister for her then husband Paul Bernardo.


Which brings us back to the crime I opened this piece with.
In this latest travesty of justice via the routinely handed down pussy pass  by the Ontario courts the woman, Liard, is absolved of all her involvement in the killing of Aleksandra.


In fact the "judge" in this case had already made up his mind on just whom the guilty party was.


"Friday after Justice David Corbett delivered a 60-page charge to the jury, instructing them on the finer points of the law. The judge also offered his opinion on certain aspects of the evidence, suggesting it seemed clear Mr. LaSota had the necessary intent for murder but questioning whether the Crown had established it was a two-person plot.


“It is hard to imagine why they would plan a killing in this way,” Judge Corbett said, citing an apparent lack of planning for body disposal or escape." [7]


And found in another article on the "judge's" comments


"Even before the trial proper began, Justice David Corbett addressed the jury, laying out some broad legal principles and providing a glimpse of the evidence that Goulin would present. Some of his comments were startling to veteran courtroom observers.


“There is no mystery about how she died,” Corbett said of the victim. “She was wounded 37 times with a knife. Several wounds were serious enough to cause death.’’


He then added: “There is no mystery as to who killed Miss Firgan-Hewie. Mr. LaSota killed her.” [8]

This last statement by the presiding judge is unbelievable. The judge before the trial even began had already, in his mind, convicted the male party to this crime and absolved the female criminal in this case.

This is pure and utter vilification of all men and the absolution of women regardless of what evidence tells us. This is how the courts here in Ontario view men and women.
Men are always evil and therefore guilty while women are always good, and therefore deserve to be absolved of their actions.

I suggest the readers go through the articles provided as sources and then if you really want to see justice done call the Attorney General's office and demand he do his job, that is to apply the law equally without favour.






[1] http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/03/20/co-accused-in-death-of-mississauga-teen-points-blame-at-former-boyfriend/?__lsa=5a5a4464

[2] http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-108.html#docCont

[3] http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-110.html#docCont

[4] http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-113.html#docCont

[5] http://osgoode.yorku.ca/media2.nsf/releases/47F95C9CE0CAE54385257011007096CA

[6] http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/serial_killers/notorious/bernardo/rapist_2.html

[7] http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/03/30/jury-begins-deliberations-in-mississauga-teen-murder-trial/?__lsa=5a5a4464

[8] http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/article/1135200--trial-begins-for-two-charged-with-13-year-old-girl-s-murder

Some Recent MRA Work

Watch and Spread

The last Statistics Canada General Social Survey report states that 6% of men and 6.4% of women are victims of domestic violence. This is contrary to the common feminist claim that domestic violence is a problem women suffer from, and men inflict.

In the video you will notice that my local constabulary make the claim that 95% of the abusers are men.

This is an outright lie. 

I can speak from personal experience that my former fiance, who assaulted me and called the cops on herself was taken to an abused woman's shelter. Thereby creating a false statistics for the Hamilton police services report on domestic violence linked in the low bar of the video. There was a verbal argument which she turned into a physical altercation. I did not initiate, retaliate or threaten her. And yet Hamilton police decided that the best solution was to take her to an abused woman's shelter.

This is contrary to the zero tolerance policy in Canada concerning domestic violence.

You will notice at the end of the video that I sent it off in an email to the attorney general himself and as well the confirmation of receiving said email.

I am waiting for their reply email indicating their plan on how to provide services for men.

BADGERS BASTION:

BADGERS BASTION:

More fucktard rulings from a Canadian Court

Here we have a common occurrence in the family court system here in Canada. The judiciary are all too willing to forget about men in attempt to appease their feminist rulers.
The question we should be asking ourselves is " if a man doesn't have the money to pay then what makes the judge think the child would have had the lifestyle if the relationship was intact?"
The answer is simple.
If the relationship was intact the amount of money generated by the primary breadwinner would be what it is. There would be no demands for more as the reality would be that's all the money we as a family unit have.
The family court judiciary needs to wake up and stop this bullshit from happening.
I believe the term would be COMMON SENSE, something today's judiciary and society at large seems to have lost.

Mississippi State University or MISSNDRY U ?

Lately I have become more and more aware of just how bad our university students have it today. I am not talking about the financial burdens placed upon them.
What I am talking about is forced participation in the now infamous walk a mile in her shoes campaigns.
These events are little more than the labeling of half the population as evil.
There is a wonderful article written about it over at A Voice for Men dot com.
Here is the Link:
Mississippi State University

Give ole miss a thorough scrutinizing at before sending you son there, with forced participation being mandated by the male fraternities in the walk a mile in her shoes campaign and no forced participation mandated on women to do the same can you say "MISSANDRY" U ?

More of Women Getting Away With Serious Life Threateninng Crimes.

Here is another doozy of misandric justice that makes me wanna bash my head against the wall to see if it makes any more sense after a self induced concussion.

On November 29 of last year,  Lisa Alyounes, 26, of the 300 block of Summit Avenue pushed her then boyfriend off the platform where they were waiting as the train approached. Luckily the gentleman was not hurt and managed to get back on the platform and got on the train with her.
This was not her playing around this was her attempting to cause him at the very least serious bodily harm if not death.
There's more, after the couple entered the train and were seated she then proceeded to assault him continually for about 5 minutes, punching and kicking him. This was all caught on tape that went viral back in early December of last year.
The train was delayed while the police were called and all the time this criminal continued her violent actions.
When the police arrive both the criminal (Lisa Alyounes) and her "boyfriend" are taken off the train and she is placed in handcuffs. It doesn't stop there, she then assaults one of the arresting officers. According to the commentary on the video she tried to knee the officer in the groin area.
Now the average person with some measure of common sense and a desire to see justice done would want this criminal put behind bars for a substantial amount of time.
Not the Camden County justice system.
According to nj.com Lisa will only face up to four months in jail for these crimes.
Let me say that again four months in jail for pushing her "boyfriend" ( I hope to hell he has moved on from this dangerous woman ) off a platform into an oncoming train and then assaulting him on the train, then resisting arrest and as well, according to eye witnesses, attempting to knee and officer in the groin.
She plead guilty to the crimes of resisting arrest and aggravated assault by attempting to cause significant bodily injury.
No charge of attempted murder for really if you push someone in front of a train you aint trying to give them a "boo boo" you are trying to kill them.

Watch the video

Just another example of the pussy pass being handed out for women in the injustice system.
Isn't it about time women were treated as adults and held accountable for their actions?

The Nanny State

Now This is a quasi MRA issue that all Canadians should be screaming about.

And here we have the nanny state trying to "co-parent"

The nanny state is getting fairly damn serious here in Canada and it is about time we put a stop to it.