Monday, 19 May 2014

Men’s Rights Activists advise men how to have consequence-free sex with drunk women (via Raw Story )

In a case that has become a cause célèbre among Men’s Rights Activists (MRA), a vote on a candidate for president of a community college was postponed after the college learned he had failed to inform it that he was on administrative leave for allegedly…

Saturday, 30 June 2012

Men’s Alternative Safe House*403-242-4077
147 Pinegrove Close NE, Calgary, AB, CA

June 30, 2012

Chief Rick Hanson
Calgary Police Service
5111 47 St. N.E.
Calgary, Alberta  T3J 3R2

RE: Case# 12237973

Dear Chief Hanson,

In MASH*4077 history guests twice relied on the CPS to enforce the law; both times the CPS response has been less than reasonable.

Benoit Simard; Peter Lougheed Hospital referred Mr. Benoit to MASH*4077 [referral letter available]. He self attended the hospital fleeing domestic violence from his female partner.
He applied for and received Alberta Children and Youth Services “Fleeing Domestic Violence Benefit”. He called CPS for assistance and file charges [third party witnesses were present], he asked the officers not to involve his employer as the abuse did not occur at his work. The officers spoke to his employer and his perpetrator; the result was Mr. Benoit was fired from his job and the officers returned to MASH*4077 to further question Mr. Benoit.
The officers, upon returning, enticed Mr. Benoit to the rear of the police car where they cornered him with the aid of the open back door of the car; the officers put on their gloves and were cornering him by closing the distance between them and Mr. Benoit. I could see the fear in Mr. Benoit’s eyes; I interfered by removing Mr. Benoit from the situation. I believe if I had not intervened Mr. Benoit would have panicked, push through to protect himself and the officers would have arrested him for assaulting a police officer; this is known fact as I have been advised of this police tactic by individuals who called the crisis line with this information. They did call the CPS for assistance but were, in fact, arrested, for assaulting an officer; the issue of their abuse was totally ignored.

Case# 12237973; A father fleeing domestic violence, with his 1 year old daughter and 9 year old son, came to MASH*4077 for assistance. A call made to CPS at 1350 hr requested an EPO as directed by the Protection Against Family Violence Act;

Another call to CPS was made, approximately 2300 hr, as no action or phone call explaining the lack of action. At approximately 2330 a call was received from the on duty Sergeant who stated that since the situation was not an emergency and the family is in a safe location, MASH4077, CPS will not do anything. This response contradicts Protection Against Family Violence Act section (2.1)(d); the Act is primarily exists for the 1 year old girl so that she may be able to sleep in her bed in her home.

CPS fails male victims of female perpetrated domestic violence; but time they mostly failed a one year old girl.

As this is the second documented time CPS failed to precisely respond the request for assistance from a male victim of female perpetrated domestic violencem I request;
  • An explanation to CPS failure to respond to family violence victims as they would if the call was imitated by a woman?
  • What does the CPS want to say to the one year old girl?
  • The next time a guest uses the protection of MASH4077 and requires CPS assistance what do we do?? What protocols are we expected to follow if CPS does not follow the designated existing protocols?

Yours truly.

Earl Silverman
Program Coordinator
While history was made at MASH4077; the Calgary Police failed the one year old girl by not allowing her to spend the night in her bed at her home.

History is made; father and children fleeing violence find shelter in Canada’s only men’s shelter

Calgary, Alberta, June 29, 2012 – MASH4077 [Men’s Alternative Safe House * 403-242-4077] is Canada’s only men’s shelter providing support and services to men, fathers and children fleeing domestic violence. This week MASH4077 provided the first shelter to a father with two children [girl 1 year & boy 9 years old] fleeing from a violent domestic household.

Family of Men Support Society is proud to be able to provide our community with the services of MASH4077; “...while the bottom line of the organization is helping children we recognize we do that through offering the children’s father the support he requires by making available this protection to his children...”

The UK government British Crime Survey demonstrated that 4.2% of women and 4.2% of men experienced domestic violence from their partner. The Canadian Statistics Canada has demonstrated equally constant family violence statistics;
·         StatsCan 2000; 8% of women & 7% of men have been abused by their partner
·         StatsCan 2005; 7% of women & 6% of men have been abused by their partner
·         StatsCan 2010; 6.4% of women & 6% of men have been abused by their partner

While there is only a mere difference of 0.4% between male and female victims of domestic violence the picture of shelters and funding is altogether a very different picture;
  • 593 funded woman’s family violence shelters in Canada representing $millions
  • 0 [zero] funded man’s family violence shelters in Canada
Prime Minister Stephen Harper does not commit to ending family violence;
Prime Minister Stephen Harper refuses to respond to the needs of children fleeing family violence with their fathers. PM Harper acknowledges that woman’s shelters receive federal grants through SOW [Status of Women Canada] but there is no federal department open to men’s agencies in the federal government.
MASH4077 is facing a court order to vacate;

Live for nothing; die for something


Live for nothing; die for something

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

Pussy Pass in Ontario Courts

"Speaking softly and chuckling at odd points in the narrative, the woman accused of plotting to kill Mississauga teenager Aleksandra Firgan-Hewie told a Superior Court jury Tuesday that her former boyfriend and co-accused acted alone." [1]

Some Canadian Law on Murder:

Homicide [2]
  • 222. (1) A person commits homicide when, directly or indirectly, by any means, he causes the death of a human being.

Classification of murder [3]
  • 231. (1) Murder is first degree murder or second degree murder.

Hijacking, sexual assault or kidnapping
(5) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of any person, murder is first degree murder in respect of a person when the death is caused by that person while committing or attempting to commit an offence under one of the following sections:
  • (a) section 76 (hijacking an aircraft);
  • (b) section 271 (sexual assault);
  • (c) section 272 (sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm);
  • (d) section 273 (aggravated sexual assault);
  • (e) section 279 (kidnapping and forcible confinement); or
  • (f) section 279.1 (hostage taking).

"Accessory after fact to murder[4]
240. Every one who is an accessory after the fact to murder is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life.
  • R.S., c. C-34, s. 223." 

There are troubling things about this case beyond the murder of a 13 year old girl. Do not take me wrong I am not belittling this horrendous crime. The guilty party(ies) deserve the book thrown at them and then some. 
The troubling part is the all to well known pussy pass. 

You know when the courts fail to hold a woman to the same standard of accountability as a man. It has been a standard of justice for quite some time now and the examples of it are too numerous to mention but lets touch upon a one shall we.

Perhaps the best well known case of the pussy pass was given to Karla Holmolka. Karla was given a reduced sentance for giving testimony against her former husband Paul Bernardo. She was given this reduced sentance on the condition that she did not lie to the police and crown attorneys when giving her confessions and or written and or recorded to them, but she did.
There was video taped evidence of her lies, but that didn't matter, Karla was given 12 years for her part in the killing of 3 young girls, despite her lies.
Need proof dear reader well here it is;

"Most people believe there was only one "deal with the devil."
That may be technically correct in terms of Homolka's essential plea bargain in May 1993 but, in truth, there were two. A second pivotal decision by Code's team on May 18, 1995 essentially gave Homolka the blanket immunity she sought from the outset. It was made on the eve of Bernardo's trial, with Homolka slated to be star witness for the prosecution.
Her 1993 plea bargain stipulated that authorities would not protect her from prosecution if she lied or left herself open to charges of "obstructing justice, public mischief, fabricating evidence, perjury, inconsistent statements and/or false affidavits."

But that's what she did, says Osgoode Hall law professor Alan Young. In a 1996 memo to Galligan, obtained this week by the Star, Young argued that Homolka "perpetrated a fraud by hiding the full extent of her criminal wrongdoing." He says she withheld evidence on the Mahaffy/French murders and covered up details of the rapes of Jane Doe. The videotapes showed the girl being sexually assaulted by the couple on two separate occasions.

Homolka apparently "forgot" about Jane Doe. It came back to her in a dream. On Oct. 6, 1993, she wrote Walker "I'm having a major problem. Paul raped Jane, a friend of mine. I don't remember much of it ... I have to tell them but what if they nail me for this too?" ....
"... Young remains skeptical. "She has a dream and it starts to come back. The first thing she does is write her lawyer asking for immunity because she's afraid she would be 'nailed' for this disclosure," he says. "She's protecting her ass. Is this an amnesia victim or a manipulative person?" [5]

" leaving Karla to keep the halothane-laden rag over her sister's face. " [6]

So there you have it Karla's deal was built on a foundation of lies told by her a manipulative killer. A Killer who I might add planned and participated in the rape of her sister for her then husband Paul Bernardo.

Which brings us back to the crime I opened this piece with.
In this latest travesty of justice via the routinely handed down pussy pass  by the Ontario courts the woman, Liard, is absolved of all her involvement in the killing of Aleksandra.

In fact the "judge" in this case had already made up his mind on just whom the guilty party was.

"Friday after Justice David Corbett delivered a 60-page charge to the jury, instructing them on the finer points of the law. The judge also offered his opinion on certain aspects of the evidence, suggesting it seemed clear Mr. LaSota had the necessary intent for murder but questioning whether the Crown had established it was a two-person plot.

“It is hard to imagine why they would plan a killing in this way,” Judge Corbett said, citing an apparent lack of planning for body disposal or escape." [7]

And found in another article on the "judge's" comments

"Even before the trial proper began, Justice David Corbett addressed the jury, laying out some broad legal principles and providing a glimpse of the evidence that Goulin would present. Some of his comments were startling to veteran courtroom observers.

“There is no mystery about how she died,” Corbett said of the victim. “She was wounded 37 times with a knife. Several wounds were serious enough to cause death.’’

He then added: “There is no mystery as to who killed Miss Firgan-Hewie. Mr. LaSota killed her.” [8]

This last statement by the presiding judge is unbelievable. The judge before the trial even began had already, in his mind, convicted the male party to this crime and absolved the female criminal in this case.

This is pure and utter vilification of all men and the absolution of women regardless of what evidence tells us. This is how the courts here in Ontario view men and women.
Men are always evil and therefore guilty while women are always good, and therefore deserve to be absolved of their actions.

I suggest the readers go through the articles provided as sources and then if you really want to see justice done call the Attorney General's office and demand he do his job, that is to apply the law equally without favour.









Sunday, 18 March 2012

Some Recent MRA Work

Watch and Spread

The last Statistics Canada General Social Survey report states that 6% of men and 6.4% of women are victims of domestic violence. This is contrary to the common feminist claim that domestic violence is a problem women suffer from, and men inflict.
In the video you will notice that my local constabulary make the claim that 95% of the abusers are men.

This is an outright lie. 

I can speak from personal experience that my former fiance, who assaulted me and called the cops on herself was taken to an abused woman's shelter. Thereby creating a false statistics for the Hamilton police services report on domestic violence linked in the low bar of the video. There was a verbal argument which she turned into a physical altercation. I did not initiate, retaliate or threaten her. And yet Hamilton police decided that the best solution was to take her to an abused woman's shelter.
This is contrary to the zero tolerance policy in Canada concerning domestic violence.
You will notice at the end of the video that I sent it off in an email to the attorney general himself and as well the confirmation of receiving said email.
I am waiting for their reply email indicating their plan on how to provide services for men.

Sunday, 11 March 2012

More fucktard rulings from a Canadian Court

Here we have a common occurrence in the family court system here in Canada. The judiciary are all too willing to forget about men in attempt to appease their feminist rulers.
The question we should be asking ourselves is " if a man doesn't have the money to pay then what makes the judge think the child would have had the lifestyle if the relationship was intact?"
The answer is simple.
If the relationship was intact the amount of money generated by the primary breadwinner would be what it is. There would be no demands for more as the reality would be that's all the money we as a family unit have.
The family court judiciary needs to wake up and stop this bullshit from happening.
I believe the term would be COMMON SENSE, something today's judiciary and society at large seems to have lost.