Saturday, 30 June 2012

Men’s Alternative Safe House*403-242-4077
147 Pinegrove Close NE, Calgary, AB, CA

June 30, 2012

Chief Rick Hanson
Calgary Police Service
5111 47 St. N.E.
Calgary, Alberta  T3J 3R2

RE: Case# 12237973

Dear Chief Hanson,

In MASH*4077 history guests twice relied on the CPS to enforce the law; both times the CPS response has been less than reasonable.

Benoit Simard; Peter Lougheed Hospital referred Mr. Benoit to MASH*4077 [referral letter available]. He self attended the hospital fleeing domestic violence from his female partner.
He applied for and received Alberta Children and Youth Services “Fleeing Domestic Violence Benefit”. He called CPS for assistance and file charges [third party witnesses were present], he asked the officers not to involve his employer as the abuse did not occur at his work. The officers spoke to his employer and his perpetrator; the result was Mr. Benoit was fired from his job and the officers returned to MASH*4077 to further question Mr. Benoit.
The officers, upon returning, enticed Mr. Benoit to the rear of the police car where they cornered him with the aid of the open back door of the car; the officers put on their gloves and were cornering him by closing the distance between them and Mr. Benoit. I could see the fear in Mr. Benoit’s eyes; I interfered by removing Mr. Benoit from the situation. I believe if I had not intervened Mr. Benoit would have panicked, push through to protect himself and the officers would have arrested him for assaulting a police officer; this is known fact as I have been advised of this police tactic by individuals who called the crisis line with this information. They did call the CPS for assistance but were, in fact, arrested, for assaulting an officer; the issue of their abuse was totally ignored.

Case# 12237973; A father fleeing domestic violence, with his 1 year old daughter and 9 year old son, came to MASH*4077 for assistance. A call made to CPS at 1350 hr requested an EPO as directed by the Protection Against Family Violence Act;

Another call to CPS was made, approximately 2300 hr, as no action or phone call explaining the lack of action. At approximately 2330 a call was received from the on duty Sergeant who stated that since the situation was not an emergency and the family is in a safe location, MASH4077, CPS will not do anything. This response contradicts Protection Against Family Violence Act section (2.1)(d); the Act is primarily exists for the 1 year old girl so that she may be able to sleep in her bed in her home.

CPS fails male victims of female perpetrated domestic violence; but time they mostly failed a one year old girl.

As this is the second documented time CPS failed to precisely respond the request for assistance from a male victim of female perpetrated domestic violencem I request;
  • An explanation to CPS failure to respond to family violence victims as they would if the call was imitated by a woman?
  • What does the CPS want to say to the one year old girl?
  • The next time a guest uses the protection of MASH4077 and requires CPS assistance what do we do?? What protocols are we expected to follow if CPS does not follow the designated existing protocols?

Yours truly.

Earl Silverman
Program Coordinator
While history was made at MASH4077; the Calgary Police failed the one year old girl by not allowing her to spend the night in her bed at her home.

History is made; father and children fleeing violence find shelter in Canada’s only men’s shelter

Calgary, Alberta, June 29, 2012 – MASH4077 [Men’s Alternative Safe House * 403-242-4077] is Canada’s only men’s shelter providing support and services to men, fathers and children fleeing domestic violence. This week MASH4077 provided the first shelter to a father with two children [girl 1 year & boy 9 years old] fleeing from a violent domestic household.

Family of Men Support Society is proud to be able to provide our community with the services of MASH4077; “...while the bottom line of the organization is helping children we recognize we do that through offering the children’s father the support he requires by making available this protection to his children...”

The UK government British Crime Survey demonstrated that 4.2% of women and 4.2% of men experienced domestic violence from their partner. The Canadian Statistics Canada has demonstrated equally constant family violence statistics;
·         StatsCan 2000; 8% of women & 7% of men have been abused by their partner
·         StatsCan 2005; 7% of women & 6% of men have been abused by their partner
·         StatsCan 2010; 6.4% of women & 6% of men have been abused by their partner

While there is only a mere difference of 0.4% between male and female victims of domestic violence the picture of shelters and funding is altogether a very different picture;
  • 593 funded woman’s family violence shelters in Canada representing $millions
  • 0 [zero] funded man’s family violence shelters in Canada
Prime Minister Stephen Harper does not commit to ending family violence;
Prime Minister Stephen Harper refuses to respond to the needs of children fleeing family violence with their fathers. PM Harper acknowledges that woman’s shelters receive federal grants through SOW [Status of Women Canada] but there is no federal department open to men’s agencies in the federal government.
MASH4077 is facing a court order to vacate;

Live for nothing; die for something


Live for nothing; die for something

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

Pussy Pass in Ontario Courts

"Speaking softly and chuckling at odd points in the narrative, the woman accused of plotting to kill Mississauga teenager Aleksandra Firgan-Hewie told a Superior Court jury Tuesday that her former boyfriend and co-accused acted alone." [1]

Some Canadian Law on Murder:

Homicide [2]
  • 222. (1) A person commits homicide when, directly or indirectly, by any means, he causes the death of a human being.

Classification of murder [3]
  • 231. (1) Murder is first degree murder or second degree murder.

Hijacking, sexual assault or kidnapping
(5) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of any person, murder is first degree murder in respect of a person when the death is caused by that person while committing or attempting to commit an offence under one of the following sections:
  • (a) section 76 (hijacking an aircraft);
  • (b) section 271 (sexual assault);
  • (c) section 272 (sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm);
  • (d) section 273 (aggravated sexual assault);
  • (e) section 279 (kidnapping and forcible confinement); or
  • (f) section 279.1 (hostage taking).

"Accessory after fact to murder[4]
240. Every one who is an accessory after the fact to murder is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life.
  • R.S., c. C-34, s. 223." 

There are troubling things about this case beyond the murder of a 13 year old girl. Do not take me wrong I am not belittling this horrendous crime. The guilty party(ies) deserve the book thrown at them and then some. 
The troubling part is the all to well known pussy pass. 

You know when the courts fail to hold a woman to the same standard of accountability as a man. It has been a standard of justice for quite some time now and the examples of it are too numerous to mention but lets touch upon a one shall we.

Perhaps the best well known case of the pussy pass was given to Karla Holmolka. Karla was given a reduced sentance for giving testimony against her former husband Paul Bernardo. She was given this reduced sentance on the condition that she did not lie to the police and crown attorneys when giving her confessions and or written and or recorded to them, but she did.
There was video taped evidence of her lies, but that didn't matter, Karla was given 12 years for her part in the killing of 3 young girls, despite her lies.
Need proof dear reader well here it is;

"Most people believe there was only one "deal with the devil."
That may be technically correct in terms of Homolka's essential plea bargain in May 1993 but, in truth, there were two. A second pivotal decision by Code's team on May 18, 1995 essentially gave Homolka the blanket immunity she sought from the outset. It was made on the eve of Bernardo's trial, with Homolka slated to be star witness for the prosecution.
Her 1993 plea bargain stipulated that authorities would not protect her from prosecution if she lied or left herself open to charges of "obstructing justice, public mischief, fabricating evidence, perjury, inconsistent statements and/or false affidavits."

But that's what she did, says Osgoode Hall law professor Alan Young. In a 1996 memo to Galligan, obtained this week by the Star, Young argued that Homolka "perpetrated a fraud by hiding the full extent of her criminal wrongdoing." He says she withheld evidence on the Mahaffy/French murders and covered up details of the rapes of Jane Doe. The videotapes showed the girl being sexually assaulted by the couple on two separate occasions.

Homolka apparently "forgot" about Jane Doe. It came back to her in a dream. On Oct. 6, 1993, she wrote Walker "I'm having a major problem. Paul raped Jane, a friend of mine. I don't remember much of it ... I have to tell them but what if they nail me for this too?" ....
"... Young remains skeptical. "She has a dream and it starts to come back. The first thing she does is write her lawyer asking for immunity because she's afraid she would be 'nailed' for this disclosure," he says. "She's protecting her ass. Is this an amnesia victim or a manipulative person?" [5]

" leaving Karla to keep the halothane-laden rag over her sister's face. " [6]

So there you have it Karla's deal was built on a foundation of lies told by her a manipulative killer. A Killer who I might add planned and participated in the rape of her sister for her then husband Paul Bernardo.

Which brings us back to the crime I opened this piece with.
In this latest travesty of justice via the routinely handed down pussy pass  by the Ontario courts the woman, Liard, is absolved of all her involvement in the killing of Aleksandra.

In fact the "judge" in this case had already made up his mind on just whom the guilty party was.

"Friday after Justice David Corbett delivered a 60-page charge to the jury, instructing them on the finer points of the law. The judge also offered his opinion on certain aspects of the evidence, suggesting it seemed clear Mr. LaSota had the necessary intent for murder but questioning whether the Crown had established it was a two-person plot.

“It is hard to imagine why they would plan a killing in this way,” Judge Corbett said, citing an apparent lack of planning for body disposal or escape." [7]

And found in another article on the "judge's" comments

"Even before the trial proper began, Justice David Corbett addressed the jury, laying out some broad legal principles and providing a glimpse of the evidence that Goulin would present. Some of his comments were startling to veteran courtroom observers.

“There is no mystery about how she died,” Corbett said of the victim. “She was wounded 37 times with a knife. Several wounds were serious enough to cause death.’’

He then added: “There is no mystery as to who killed Miss Firgan-Hewie. Mr. LaSota killed her.” [8]

This last statement by the presiding judge is unbelievable. The judge before the trial even began had already, in his mind, convicted the male party to this crime and absolved the female criminal in this case.

This is pure and utter vilification of all men and the absolution of women regardless of what evidence tells us. This is how the courts here in Ontario view men and women.
Men are always evil and therefore guilty while women are always good, and therefore deserve to be absolved of their actions.

I suggest the readers go through the articles provided as sources and then if you really want to see justice done call the Attorney General's office and demand he do his job, that is to apply the law equally without favour.









Sunday, 18 March 2012

Some Recent MRA Work

Watch and Spread

The last Statistics Canada General Social Survey report states that 6% of men and 6.4% of women are victims of domestic violence. This is contrary to the common feminist claim that domestic violence is a problem women suffer from, and men inflict.
In the video you will notice that my local constabulary make the claim that 95% of the abusers are men.

This is an outright lie. 

I can speak from personal experience that my former fiance, who assaulted me and called the cops on herself was taken to an abused woman's shelter. Thereby creating a false statistics for the Hamilton police services report on domestic violence linked in the low bar of the video. There was a verbal argument which she turned into a physical altercation. I did not initiate, retaliate or threaten her. And yet Hamilton police decided that the best solution was to take her to an abused woman's shelter.
This is contrary to the zero tolerance policy in Canada concerning domestic violence.
You will notice at the end of the video that I sent it off in an email to the attorney general himself and as well the confirmation of receiving said email.
I am waiting for their reply email indicating their plan on how to provide services for men.

Sunday, 11 March 2012

More fucktard rulings from a Canadian Court

Here we have a common occurrence in the family court system here in Canada. The judiciary are all too willing to forget about men in attempt to appease their feminist rulers.
The question we should be asking ourselves is " if a man doesn't have the money to pay then what makes the judge think the child would have had the lifestyle if the relationship was intact?"
The answer is simple.
If the relationship was intact the amount of money generated by the primary breadwinner would be what it is. There would be no demands for more as the reality would be that's all the money we as a family unit have.
The family court judiciary needs to wake up and stop this bullshit from happening.
I believe the term would be COMMON SENSE, something today's judiciary and society at large seems to have lost.

Mississippi State University or MISSNDRY U ?

Lately I have become more and more aware of just how bad our university students have it today. I am not talking about the financial burdens placed upon them.
What I am talking about is forced participation in the now infamous walk a mile in her shoes campaigns.
These events are little more than the labeling of half the population as evil.
There is a wonderful article written about it over at A Voice for Men dot com.
Here is the Link:
Mississippi State University

Give ole miss a thorough scrutinizing at before sending you son there, with forced participation being mandated by the male fraternities in the walk a mile in her shoes campaign and no forced participation mandated on women to do the same can you say "MISSANDRY" U ?

Thursday, 1 March 2012

More of Women Getting Away With Serious Life Threateninng Crimes.

Here is another doozy of misandric justice that makes me wanna bash my head against the wall to see if it makes any more sense after a self induced concussion.

On November 29 of last year,  Lisa Alyounes, 26, of the 300 block of Summit Avenue pushed her then boyfriend off the platform where they were waiting as the train approached. Luckily the gentleman was not hurt and managed to get back on the platform and got on the train with her.
This was not her playing around this was her attempting to cause him at the very least serious bodily harm if not death.
There's more, after the couple entered the train and were seated she then proceeded to assault him continually for about 5 minutes, punching and kicking him. This was all caught on tape that went viral back in early December of last year.
The train was delayed while the police were called and all the time this criminal continued her violent actions.
When the police arrive both the criminal (Lisa Alyounes) and her "boyfriend" are taken off the train and she is placed in handcuffs. It doesn't stop there, she then assaults one of the arresting officers. According to the commentary on the video she tried to knee the officer in the groin area.
Now the average person with some measure of common sense and a desire to see justice done would want this criminal put behind bars for a substantial amount of time.
Not the Camden County justice system.
According to Lisa will only face up to four months in jail for these crimes.
Let me say that again four months in jail for pushing her "boyfriend" ( I hope to hell he has moved on from this dangerous woman ) off a platform into an oncoming train and then assaulting him on the train, then resisting arrest and as well, according to eye witnesses, attempting to knee and officer in the groin.
She plead guilty to the crimes of resisting arrest and aggravated assault by attempting to cause significant bodily injury.
No charge of attempted murder for really if you push someone in front of a train you aint trying to give them a "boo boo" you are trying to kill them.

Watch the video

Just another example of the pussy pass being handed out for women in the injustice system.
Isn't it about time women were treated as adults and held accountable for their actions?

Tuesday, 28 February 2012

The Nanny State

Now This is a quasi MRA issue that all Canadians should be screaming about.

And here we have the nanny state trying to "co-parent"

The nanny state is getting fairly damn serious here in Canada and it is about time we put a stop to it.

This video cracks me up well worth the watch

Pussy Pass

Today I am just going to make s short blog post as I have been busy doing some local stuff and haven't been able to put it all together. Just a quick heads up about it though there were lots of recordings made and I have one video ready to go but there is much more that needs to be done before I am ready to post it. Currently I have about a dozen recordings of government employees, and government funded organizations on the topic of lack of funding for men's issues.

"Dava Alizabeth-Ann Steen, 47, was sentenced to six months in jail, which she can serve at home while under electronic monitoring, said her attorney, Public Defender Robin Lipetzky."[1]

Here we go with today's misandric justice system find and it should disgust any rule of law loving individual.
According to the linked article Ms Steen's boyfriend  Danny Ray Bennett died on November 25 and when police were called she indicated the cause of his death was due to his health problems.
Fast forward to January 17 of this year and a tip to Concord investigators alleged that Ms Steen had in fact killed Mr. Bennett. The police did their job and discovered evidence indicating she had suffocated Mr. Bennett with a pillow.
Ms. Steen was charged with murder.

So already Ms. Steen had lied to the police in regards to Mr. Bennett's death.

Now you would think that once an individual is proven to be a liar they're credibility would always be in question, but that logical thinking only applies if you are a man. If your a woman your credibility remains intact.

So after being charged she then alleges that she was abused by Mr. Bennett and it appears the district attorney believed her. The article makes mention that there was a long history of domestic violence in which she was the victim.

Now call me crazy but given the size of this woman and the fact that she was able to suffocate Mr. Bennett with a pillow I'm going to have to call bullshit on her being the victim.
Common sense tells us that the true abuser was most likely Ms. Steen but primary aggressor laws demand that men be arrested. As according to femie dogma men are always the abuser in a relationship.
So what this all boils down to is the justice system giving this animal a pussy pass never once attempting to discover whether or not she as well lied about the extent of her alleged abuse. After all she already lied about the circumstances surrounding the victims death so why wouldn't she lie about being abused?

This case really stinks of the courts being all to willing to believe a murderess' lies while ignoring evidence that proves otherwise.